Power4Georgians Targets Rural Georgia Again for Dirty Coal Plant
Waynesville, Ga. — A private consortium of electric cooperatives, Power4Georgians (P4G), intends to develop a second 850-megawatt coal-fired plant in Georgia, in addition to Plant Washington, north of Sandersville in middle Georgia. Its second plant would be near Fitzgerald in south-central Ben Hill County. Located on the Ocmulgee River, proposed Plant Ben Hill’s coal-burning technology would require enormous water resources in the production of electricity and would emit dangerous pollutants affecting the immediate area as well as downstream and upwind communities.
Power4Georgians, LLC, is composed of five electric membership corporations (EMCs). They are: Cobb EMC (Cobb County and surrounding area); Central Georgia EMC (south metro Atlanta, north Macon area); Snapping Shoals EMC (southeast Atlanta metro area); Upson EMC (six counties in west central Georgia); and Washington EMC (Sandersville area, Washington County).
While these plans have been kept quiet and the public is just learning about them, the proposal to create Plant Ben Hill is active, according to Dean Alford, president of Allied Energy Services (AES) and spokesman for Power4Georgians. Alford recently met with members of the Fall-line Alliance for a Clean Environment (FACE) and noted that he was developing Plant Ben Hill as well as Plant Washington. Conservative cost estimates for construction of both proposed coal-burning plants is more than $4.6 billion – more than $13,800 in debt for each of the 333,133 EMC members in the Power4Georgians consortium.
Organizations across Georgia are also troubled by the damaging pollution the proposed coal-fired Ben Hill plant would have on air quality, rivers and watersheds, farms, and health.





Foreclosure rates have increased immensely in 2009, leaving Georgia with the 

Five EPD staffers were seated at a table to the left of a large screen on stage and three Power4Georgian (P4G) spokesmen were seated at a table on the right. The meeting was filmed and recorded. The EPD staff presented in turn on solid waste, site suitability, the water withdrawal application, discharge to the river, geological models of Twiggs Clay and Cretaceous aquifers, simulations of well operation and drawdowns at different locations and times, and air permit pollution control measures. The presentations were highly technical. They concluded by saying that since the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the EPD regarding CO2 and plant design issues, plans for Plant Washington will proceed.
On Tuesday, Oct. 6th, Georgia citizens gathered together at statewide public hearings sponsored by a coalition of organizations called 



